等周不等式:Steiner 对称化、Minkowski-Steiner 公式与变分图像

旧博客原文

原题:Isoperimetric inequality

Introduction

the statement go isometry inequality is very simple:

\Omega\subset R^n, iff \Omega is a ball, \frac{Vol(\Omega)}{Surf(\Omega)} arrive a minimum .

This is a classical problem in variation theory. The difficult is divide into two parts. The first is to create a “flow” which descrement the  energy and the “flow” is compatible with the feature of a ball, i.e. every set under the flow will tend to like a “ball”. The second one is to proof there exist a unit in the space surf(\Omega)=constant>0 make the Energy E(\Omega)=Vol(\Omega) arrive a minimum.

Combine this two property we can consult that ball is the set and definitely the only set make the \frac{Vol(\Omega)}{Surf(\Omega)} arrive the minimum.

 

first difficulties

The energy $E(\Omega)$ is scaling invariance. The first difficult could divide into two part:

Restrict to convex set

the first is to deform  a set into a convex set and proof this process would not lower \frac{Vol(\Omega)}{Surf(\Omega)} . This could been a little subtle. and the way I image could make sense is just like the following transform:

QQ20171116-151122@2x

but this process is harder in higher dimension, for example:

0D1371F0-19C9-480B-8804-EC2281B6A0C8

Convex set to a ball

Steiner symmetric process.

img_0500

               Affine transform

img_0501

Minkowski–Steiner formula
In mathematics, the Minkowski–Steiner formula is a formula relating the surface area and volume of compact subsets of Euclidean space. More precisely, it defines the surface area as the “derivative” of enclosed volume in an appropriate sense.

The Minkowski–Steiner formula is used, together with the Brunn–Minkowski theorem, to prove the isoperimetric inequality. It is named after Hermann Minkowski and Jakob Steiner.

Statement of the Minkowski-Steiner formula

Let n \geq 2, and let A \subsetneq \mathbb{R}^{n} be a compact set. Let \mu (A) denote the [[Lebesgue measure]] (volume) of A. Define the quantity \lambda (\partial A) by the ”’Minkowski–Steiner formula”’:

\lambda (\partial A) := \liminf_{\delta \to 0} \frac{\mu \left( A + \overline{B_{\delta}} \right) - \mu (A)}{\delta}

where:

\overline{B_{\delta}} := \left\{ x = (x_{1}, \dots, x_{n}) \in \mathbb{R}^{n} \left| | x | := \sqrt{x_{1}^{2} + \dots + x_{n}^{2}} \leq \delta \right. \right\}

denotes the  [[closed ball]] of [[radius]] \delta > 0, and:

A + \overline{B_{\delta}} := \left\{ a + b \in \mathbb{R}^{n} \left| a \in A, b \in \overline{B_{\delta}} \right. \right\}

is the [[Minkowski sum]] of $latexA$ and \overline{B_{\delta}}, so that:

A + \overline{B_{\delta}} = \left\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^{n} | |x - a| \leq \delta \mbox{ for some } a \in A \right\}.

Surface measure

For “sufficiently regular” sets A, the quantity \lambda (\partial A) does indeed correspond with the (n - 1)-dimensional measure of the [[boundary (topology)|boundary]] \partial A of A. See Federer (1969) for a full treatment of this problem.

Convex sets

When the set A is a [[convex set]], the [[limit inferior|lim-inf]] above is a true [[Limit of a sequence|limit]], and one can show that

:\mu \left( A + \overline{B_{\delta}} \right) = \mu (A) + \lambda (\partial A) \delta + \sum_{i = 2}^{n - 1} \lambda_{i} (A) \delta^{i} + \omega_{n} \delta^{n},

where the \lambda_{i} are some [[continuous function]]s of A< (see [[quermassintegral]]s) and $\omega_{n}$ denotes the measure (volume) of the [[unit ball]] in \mathbb{R}^{n}:

:\omega_{n} = \frac{2 \pi^{n / 2}}{n \Gamma (n / 2)},

where \Gamma denotes the [[Gamma function]].

==Example: volume and surface area of a ball==

Taking A = \overline{B_{R}} gives the following well-known formula for the surface area of the [[sphere]] of radius R, S_{R} := \partial B_{R}:

:\lambda (S_{R}) = \lim_{\delta \to 0} \frac{\mu \left( \overline{B_{R}} + \overline{B_{\delta}} \right) - \mu \left( \overline{B_{R}} \right)}{\delta}
::= \lim_{\delta \to 0} \frac{[ (R + \delta)^{n} - R^{n} ] \omega_{n}}{\delta}
::= n R^{n - 1} \omega_{n},

where \omega_{n} is as above.

something with more details

 

The second difficulties

To establish a continue property of the Energy functional E(\Omega)= \frac{Vol(\Omega)}{Surf(\Omega)}.

the continuous property is consider with all open set \Omega with Gromov-Hausdorff metric d(\Omega_1,\Omega_2)= \inf_{metric\  d on \Omega_1 \cup \Omega_2}\sup_{x_1\in \Omega_1, x_2\in \Omega_2}d(x_1,x_2).

We need to proof the continuous of E(\Omega) with the Gromov-hausdorff metric on the space consist with convex open sets.

To remark,we need to observe that polygon approximation is just corresponding to the \delta-seperate points approximation in Gromov-hausdorff distance. and definitely carefully refinement of this kind of approximation could lead to the result of continuous of the energy E(\Omega) on convex set.

A second remark, we definitely need a definition of the surf(\Omega) it could be achieve with open convex set \Omega by a outer and inter approximation by polygon and the error term estimate.

Further remark, isoperimetric inequality is a general phenomenon.

 

 


补充说明

以下是新整理的中文说明;上方旧博客原文保持不变。

等周不等式说,在给定体积的集合中,球的边界面积最小。它是变分法、凸几何和几何测度论共同的基本定理。

等周不等式:Steiner 对称化、Minkowski-Steiner 公式与变分图像
等周不等式说明固定体积下球最小化 perimeter,可由对称化或 Brunn-Minkowski 思想证明。

1. 基本陈述

在 $\mathbb R^n$ 中,等周不等式为

$$P(\Omega)^n\ge n^n\omega_n |\Omega|^{n-1},$$

等号当且仅当 $\Omega$ 是球。这里 $P(\Omega)$ 是 perimeter,$\omega_n$ 是单位球体积。

2. 变分图像

一个自然想法是构造能量下降 flow,使任意集合逐渐变圆,并且不增加 perimeter、不改变体积。真正困难在于:一般集合可能很粗糙,flow 的存在性和紧性都需要处理。

3. Steiner 对称化

Steiner symmetrization 沿一个方向把每条平行线上的截面替换成居中的区间。它保持体积,并且不增加 perimeter。重复对称化后,集合越来越接近球。

这提供了一个几何证明路线:先把集合变得越来越对称,再用紧性取极限。

4. Minkowski-Steiner 公式

对足够好的集合,考虑外平行体

$$\Omega_t=\Omega+tB.$$

Minkowski-Steiner 公式把 $|\Omega_t|$ 展开成 $t$ 的多项式,其一次项与 perimeter 相关:

$$\left.\frac{d}{dt}\right|_{t=0}|\Omega+tB|=P(\Omega).$$

配合 Brunn-Minkowski 不等式,可以推出等周不等式。

5. 核心困难

等周问题的困难可以分成两部分:一是证明极小值存在,二是证明极小者只能是球。前者需要紧性和 lower semicontinuity,后者需要对称化、Euler-Lagrange 方程或 Brunn-Minkowski 凹性。

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注